1.) is this flagged as mature content? 2.) if it is and you dont want to see stuff like this then HIDE mature content.
guys will do this on just about every single ssite they can because they know it will bring in traffic, which you are helping to achive by coming here and complaining. personally i dont care about this stuff because i know its gonna happen so yeah if you really want to try and convince someone to stop this or whatever and waste what little time you have on this planet to argue about something on the internet instead of doing something constructive by all means do so i won't stop you i just wont join you >.>
Not as if I would enjoy seeing this on an art website, but where is this mature content? the breasts are pretty covered And it is possible that a woman has this size naturally. Would she have to check mature content as well?
I think its wrong that this person has taken a picture of an innocent women (maybe without her permission!) and photo shopped it into an outrageous picture. Plus it advertises women changing their body. The media these days has included the children of our time in the wrong ways.
Very true but the artist may have not asked permission which in itself is wrong. I'm 14 so can't study art histry yet but I am solely going on personal opinions and my health and social classes. I myself have been affected by media and never think 'you know what? I'm happy as I am' and I blame media for this mind set. s picture is outrageous and needs to go.
It is fascinating to read the various reactions to works like these posted here on DA.
Let me say from the beginning, if this photomanipulation (which it is clearly categorized as) is done without the permission of the young lady in the photograph, then serious concerns can, and should, be raised.
The reaction to this picture for its content, however, is fascinating.
If this was celebrating sexuality that challenged traditional conventions (encouraging homosexuality, feminism, etc.) it would be universally lauded and praised in the name of tolerance and diversity.
Any submission, however, that seems to focus on traditional, if not juvenile, male sexual fantasies (overtly sexualized poses, skimpy fantasy armors, and/or especially large breasts) brings condemnation and derision as not being artistic.
What I rarely read is the logic behind such comments. If one is committed to a liberal definition of art, and a true understanding of tolerance, then such things should be allowed, though with the appropriate warning labels if required.
If one objects, then why? Is it simply something one doesn't like? Sure you can voice your opinion, but I don't see the logic of implying such things shouldn't be popular, or even present, on DA if based on one's mere preferences.
If one does call for censorship, then why? If it isn't artistic, by what standards are you using to judge something as having the appropriate artistic value to be on this site or not? It it is morally objectionable, and should be censored on those grounds, by what rules are you using to make such a demand?
Though this picture isn't my personally cup of tea, the comments such pieces generate are fascinating.
WHERE THE FUCK IS THE CITATION? WHO THE FUCK IS SHE!? DID YOU GET PERMISSION TO USE THIS FOR YOUR SHITTY PHOTOSHOP?! WHY MUST PEOPLE LIKE YOU COME IN AND CLAIM TO HAVE SOME KIND OF "ARTISTIC ABILITY" AND POST THIS LEVEL OF MONKEY SHIT ALL THE FUCKING TIME AND RUIN, NOT ONLY THE SITES REPUTATION, BUT THE FUCKING FRONT PAGE?! HALF YOUR SHIT YOU DON'T EVEN HAVE THE RIGHTS TO POST.
Yes you're right, breasts are beautiful and I have seen it well presented in some amazing artistic nudes on this site. However people like the one that posted this image merely take that one unique physical attribute of the feminine form and pervert it to the point where it stops being considered beautiful and instead just becomes porn, porn that can easily be accessed through thousands upon thousands of sites that are tailored towards that concept. How such garbage can garner so much attention yet deviations that actually put some thought and effort into them barely get noticed, I have to sadly wonder if humanity is progressing or if in reality we're all just mindless drones that never really accomplish much in life.
So true and well spoken. Maybe people are sane after all in what is classified as good art. Nudes are fantastic if done well but this is just pathetic. As you said it is just porn and there are suitable places as to where that is accessible.
Completely agree. This site is supposed to be about art, and this is so horrible cellphone photo that is popular base solely on her breasts. If this is what is popular, I lose faith in the human population.
When you people comment in this "thing", you give the attention that don't deserve this kind of "art", focus in the good artist that stay here and ignore the rest. You don't ask me but is my free advice.
Your last phrase is funny: "If this is what is popular, I lose faith in the human population".
Sadly this site has become a place where objectifying women is more popular than depicting them as actual people, forums becoming a haven full of nut jobs from every walk of life, fave running spambots left and right without a second thought, and the importance of fetish smut and My Little Pony fan art over anything even remotely trying to be original.